System and method for data de-duplication

ABSTRACT

Disclosed are methods, systems, and computer program products for processing a file which include using a computer system that is programmed for performing a process of receiving the file in response to a request for storing the file, determining whether a database already contains the file, and storing the file in the database if the database does not already contain the file. The process may alternatively include receiving the file in response to a request for storing the file, determining whether a database already contains the file, and storing the file without storing the received file if the database already contains the file. The process may also alternatively include receiving the file in response to a request for storing the file in a database, separating the file into a plurality of portions, and storing the plurality of portions so each of the plurality of portions can be individually accessed.

RELATED APPLICATION DATA

This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/584,144, entitled “System and method for data compression”, and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/584,415, entitled “System and method for data encryption”.

FIELD

This application relates generally to systems and methods for storing and accessing data, and more specifically, to systems and methods for storing and accessing LOB data.

BACKGROUND

Files, such as LOB files, serve the goal of providing a content-rich store for unstructured data. Some applications give rise to the duplicated storage of LOB data, and thereby waste a significant amount of storage space. The ability to identify LOBs that have identical content and for those LOBs to share a single data repository is therefore desirable.

LOB data, residing in mainline or archived storage devices, can grow into very large sizes. This provides disk space and disk management challenges to administrators. Data compression is a commonly used mechanism to minimize disk space requirements. It is thus desirable to compress LOB data and provide random access to compressed data. In existing approaches, an algorithm is used to compress or decompress a source LOB to a destination LOB. The destination LOB is either a temporary LOB or an existing LOB, in which case it is overwritten. This technique requires creation of an explicit destination LOB and does not provide random access to LOB data.

Another problem with existing technique for storing LOB data is that the LOB data is stored unencrypted on-disk. However, in many cases, securing sensitive information is critical for meeting business and compliance requirements.

SUMMARY

In accordance with some embodiments, a method of processing a file includes receiving a request to store the file, receiving the file, determining whether a database already contains the file, and storing the file in the database if the database does not already contain the file.

In accordance with other embodiments, a system for processing a file includes means for receiving a request to store the file, means for receiving the file, means for determining whether a database already contains the file, and means for storing the file in the database if the database does not already contain the file.

In accordance with other embodiments, a computer product having a computer-useable medium storing a set of instruction, wherein an execution of the instruction causes a process to be performed, the process includes receiving a request to store the file, receiving the file, determining whether a database already contains the file, and storing the file in the database if the database does not already contain the file.

In accordance with other embodiments, a method of processing a file includes receiving a request to store the file, receiving the file, determining whether a database already contains the file, and satisfying the request to store the file without storing the received file if the database already contains the file.

In accordance with other embodiments, a system for processing a file includes means for receiving a request to store the file, means for receiving the file, means for determining whether a database already contains the file, and means for satisfying the request to store the file without storing the received file if the database already contains the file.

In accordance with other embodiments, a computer product having a computer-useable medium storing a set of instruction, wherein an execution of the instruction causes a process to be performed, the process includes receiving a request to store the file, receiving the file, determining whether a database already contains the file, and satisfying the request to store the file without storing the received file if the database already contains the file.

In accordance with other embodiments, a method of processing data from a file includes receiving a request to store the file in a database, receiving the file, separating the file into a plurality of portions, and storing the plurality of portions such that each of the plurality of portions can be individually accessed.

In accordance with other embodiments, a system for processing data from a file includes means for receiving a request to store the file in a database, means for receiving the file, means for separating the file into a plurality of portions, and means for storing the plurality of portions such that each of the plurality of portions can be individually accessed.

In accordance with other embodiments, a computer product having a computer-useable medium storing a set of instruction, wherein an execution of the instruction causes a process to be performed, the process includes receiving a request to store the file in a database, receiving the file, separating the file into a plurality of portions, and storing the plurality of portions such that each of the plurality of portions can be individually accessed.

Other aspects and features will be evident from reading the following detailed description of the embodiments.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The drawings illustrate the design and utility of embodiments, in which similar elements are referred to by common reference numerals. In order to better appreciate how advantages and objects of the embodiments are obtained, a more particular description of the embodiments will be illustrated in the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 illustrates a system having a data receiving module and a data de-duplication module in accordance with some embodiments;

FIG. 2 illustrates a process performed by the data receiving module of FIG. 1 in accordance with some embodiments;

FIG. 3 illustrates a process performed by the data de-duplication module of FIG. 1 in accordance with some embodiments;

FIG. 4A illustrates metadata associated with a stored file in accordance with some embodiments, particularly showing file “XYZ” having been stored;

FIG. 4B illustrates metadata associated with a stored file in accordance with other embodiments;

FIG. 4C illustrates metadata associated with a stored file in accordance with other embodiments;

FIG. 5A illustrates metadata associated with a stored file in accordance with some embodiments, particularly showing two files, “XYZ” and “ABC” having the same data that are stored once;

FIG. 5B illustrates metadata associated with two stored files in accordance with some embodiments, particularly showing two files, “XYZ” and “ABC” having the same data that are stored twice;

FIG. 6 illustrates metadata associated with a stored file in accordance with some embodiments, particular showing that the file “XYZ” has been removed;

FIG. 7 illustrates metadata associated with a stored file in accordance with some embodiments, particularly showing that the file is separated into a plurality of blocks;

FIG. 8 illustrates a system having a data compression module in accordance with some embodiments;

FIG. 9 illustrates a process performed by the data compression module of FIG. 8 in accordance with some embodiments;

FIG. 10 illustrates compression units having sub-units in accordance with some embodiments;

FIG. 11A illustrates metadata of a stored file in accordance with some embodiments, particularly showing metadata having information regarding data compression;

FIG. 11B illustrates metadata of a stored file in accordance with other embodiments, particularly showing blocks of the file having their respective data compression information;

FIG. 12 illustrates data compression maps associated with the compression units of FIG. 10 in accordance with some embodiments;

FIG. 13 illustrates compression units in accordance with other embodiments;

FIG. 14 illustrates a system having a data encryption module in accordance with some embodiments;

FIG. 15 illustrates a process performed by the data encryption module of FIG. 14 in accordance with some embodiments;

FIG. 16A illustrates metadata of a stored file in accordance with some embodiments, particularly showing metadata having information regarding data encryption;

FIG. 16B illustrates metadata of a stored file in accordance with other embodiments, particularly blocks of the file having their respective data encryption information;

FIG. 17A-17B illustrate a technique of using a state indicator to keep track of a file that has been re-keyed; and

FIG. 18 illustrates a block diagram of a computer system that can be used to perform various functions described herein in accordance with some embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Various embodiments are described hereinafter with reference to the figures. It should be noted that the figures are not drawn to scale and elements of similar structures or functions are represented by like reference numerals throughout the figures. It should also be noted that the figures are only intended to facilitate the description of embodiments. They are not intended as an exhaustive description of the invention or as a limitation on the scope of the invention. In addition, an aspect described in conjunction with a particular embodiment is not necessarily limited to that embodiment and can be practiced in any other embodiments.

De-Duplication

FIG. 1 illustrates a system 10 configured to process data in accordance with some embodiments. In the illustrated embodiments, the system 10 is configured to receive a request from a client 12 to store data, receive the data, process the data, and store the data in a database 14 so that the data can be accessed at a later time. The client 12 may be a computer, or a handheld device, such as a phone, a PDA, a MP3 player, or other devices. In the illustrated embodiments, the clients 12 a, 12 b are communicatively connected to the system 10 via the internet. Alternatively, the clients 12 a, 12 b may be communicatively coupled to the system 10 using other techniques, such as, through a cable, or Bluetooth technology. Although only two clients 12 a, 12 b are shown, it should be understood that the system 10 may communicate with more than two clients 12. In the illustrated embodiments, the database 14 is communicatively coupled to the system 10. In other embodiments, the database 14 may be a part of the system 10. The system 10 may be implemented using a hardware, such as a computer, or a processor. In other embodiments, the system 10 may be implemented using software. In further embodiments, the system 10 may be implemented using a combination of hardware and software.

In the illustrated embodiments, the system is configured to receive LOB file from a client. The LOB file may have a large size, e.g., a size that is larger than 500 kb, and more particularly, a size that is larger than 1 Mb. Alternatively, the LOB file may have other sizes. In some embodiments, the LOB file may be an image file (e.g., a .gif file) or an audio file (e.g., a MP3 file). In other embodiments, the LOB file may be of other data types. In further embodiments, the system is configured to receive other type of files or objects from client(s) 12.

As shown in FIG. 1, the system 10 includes a data receiving module 20 and a de-duplication module 22. The data receiving module 20 is configured to receive and pass data to the de-duplication module 22 in a manner prescribed by the system 10. The de-duplication module 20 is configured to analyze data received from a client 12, and determine whether the received data is already stored at database 14. In some cases, if the data is already stored at the database 14, and duplication of the stored data is not desired, the de-duplication module 20 then updates the database 14 to reflect the fact that more than one client 12 has requested the same data be stored. In such cases, the duplication module 22 would not store an additional copy of the data. In other cases, if the data is already stored at the database 14, and duplication of the stored data is desired, the de-duplication module 20 may then store the additional data even though a copy of which is already stored at the database 14.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a process 100 that is performed by the data receiving module 20 in accordance with some embodiments. In the illustrated example, the data requested by a client 12 (e.g., client 12 a) to be stored by the system 10 is a LOB file 50. However, it is understood that the system 10 can be configured to store other types of data. First, the data receiving module 20 receives a portion of the LOB file 50 (Step 102). Next, the data receiving module 20 determines a size of the total received portion (Step 104). The data receiving module 20 then compares the size with a prescribed data processing threshold (Step 106). The data processing threshold may be, for examples, 260 kB, 1 MB, or other values set by a user. If the size of the cumulative collected data is equal or larger than the prescribed data processing threshold, the data receiving module 20 then passes the collected data (e.g., block 52 a) downstream for further processing, and continues to collect the remaining portions of the LOB file 50 (Step 109). On the other hand, if the size of the cumulative collected data is less than the prescribed data processing threshold, the data receiving module 20 then continues to collect additional portions of the LOB file 50 (Step 110) until the size of the total collected portions reach the prescribed data processing threshold. As a result of the process 100, the LOB file 50 is passed downstream (e.g., to the de-duplication module 22) in the form of blocks 52 (e.g., blocks 52 a-52 e in the example), each of which having a size that is equal or less then the prescribed processing threshold. Although five blocks 52 are shown in the example, in other examples, the file 50 may be separated into other numbers of portions/blocks 52. Such technique is advantageous in that the de-duplication module 22 does not need to wait for an entire LOB file 50 to be collected before it starts analyzing the data of the LOB file. Also, in some cases, if the de-duplication module 22 (or another processing unit downstream) does not have enough memory to store the entire LOB file, the above data passing technique would allow the de-duplication module 22 (or another processing unit downstream) to process the data of the LOB file 50.

In the illustrated embodiments, the system 10 includes a user interface that allows a user, such as an administrator, to input the prescribed data processing threshold. The user interface may include, for example, a screen, a keyboard, and a mouse. Also, in some embodiments, the user interface may allow a user to activate or deactivate the data receiving module 20. If the data receiving module 20 is deactivated, data of the LOB file 50 received from the client 12 would be transmitted to the de-duplication module 22 without being processed by the data receiving module 20.

FIG. 3 illustrates a process 120 that is performed by the de-duplication module 22 in accordance with some embodiments. As shown in the figure, the de-duplication module 22 receives the LOB file 50 (Step 122), and determines whether the LOB file 50 was already stored (Step 124). Various techniques may be used to determine whether a LOB file has been stored previously. In some embodiments, the de-duplication module 22 is configured to calculate a hash value associated with the LOB file using an algorithm such as SHA1 or MD5. In such case, as the LOB file data is being received or written to a storage or temporary memory, a rolling hash value for the portion of the LOB file that has been received is calculated. A final hash value of the LOB file data is calculated at completion of the writing process, which uniquely identifies the LOB file data. In some embodiments, a B-tree may be used to maintain the calculated rolling hash value(s). Any of the techniques known in the art may be used to calculate the hash value.

For example, upon receiving the first block 52 a of the LOB file 50, the de-duplication module 22 then calculates a hash value for the block 52 a. The de-duplication module 22 then checks to see if the calculated hash value can be found in the database 14. For example, the de-duplication module 22 can look up a hash value table or a B-tree. If the calculated hash value cannot be found, then the de-duplication module 22 determines that the LOB file 50 is not yet stored by the system 10. Alternatively, if the calculated hash value can be found, the de-duplication module 22 then continues to receive the next block 52 b of the LOB file 50, and calculates a second hash value using the data from block 52 b. The de-duplication module 22 then checks the database 14 again to see if the second calculated hash value can be found. If the second calculated hash value cannot be found, then the de-duplication module 22 determines that the LOB file 50 is not yet stored by the system 10. Alternatively, if the second calculated hash value can be found, the de-duplication module 22 then continues to receive the next block 52 c of the LOB file, and calculates a third hash value using the data from block 52 b. The above process is repeated until the last block 52 (e.g., block 52 e) of the LOB file 50 is received and processed. If the last calculated hash value cannot be found, then the de-duplication module 22 determines that the LOB file 50 is not yet stored by the system 10. Alternatively, if the last calculated hash value can be found, then the de-duplication module 22 determines that the LOB file 50 is already stored in database 14.

In other embodiments, instead of performing a hash lookup for each of the blocks, the hash lookup may be performed after the LOB file 50 has been received. For example, the system 10 may be configured to detect an end of file (EOF), and upon detecting the EOF, the system 10 then performs data de-duplication, as discussed herein. Such technique may have the benefit of reducing consumption of CPU resource.

In the above embodiments, the data receiving module 20 passes portions of the LOB file 50 to the de-duplication module 22, thereby allowing the de-duplication module 22 to process blocks 52 of the LOB file 50 have certain prescribed size. However, in other embodiments, the system 10 may not include the data receiving module 20. In such cases, the de-duplication module 22 receives the entire LOB file 50 before it starts processing the LOB file 50. Also, in further embodiments, the de-duplication module 22 may not need to calculate hash value(s). For example, in other embodiments, the calculation of hash value(s) for the LOB file 50 may be performed by another system (e.g., another computer or software that may communicate with the system 10 using the internet or other communication devices), or by the client 12. In such cases, the de-duplication module 22 receives the hash value(s) and determines whether the LOB file 50 desired to be stored by the client 12 is already stored by the system 10 based on the received hash value(s).

Returning to FIG. 3, if the de-duplication module 22 determines that the LOB file 50 is not already stored, the de-duplication module 22 then stores the LOB file 50 in the database 14 (Step 126). In some embodiments, the system 10 is configured to receive the entire LOB file 50 before it is passed downstream to be stored. In other embodiments, the system 10 allows a data collection threshold to be inputted (e.g., via a user interface). In such cases, data of the LOB file 50 is passed downstream to be stored based on the prescribed data collection threshold. For example, the system 10 may be configured to monitor the size of the portion of the LOB file 50 that has been processed by the de-duplication module 22. When the size of the portion reaches or exceeds the prescribed data collection threshold, the system 10 then stores the portion of the LOB file 50.

In the illustrated embodiments, the system 10 also maintains metadata regarding the stored LOB file 50. FIG. 4A illustrates a table 300 of metadata for the LOB file 50 that may be stored in the database 14. As shown in the figure, the metadata includes the final calculated hash value 302 that uniquely identifies the LOB file 50, an identifier 304 of the LOB file 50, an address 306 of the physical storage location that stores the LOB file data, a counter 308, and a de-duplication flag 310. The identifier 304 of the LOB file 50 may be prescribed by the client (e.g., client 12 a), and may be the name of the LOB file 50 that the client 12 wishes to use. In the illustrated example, the client 12 a has requested that the name “XYZ” be used for the LOB file 50. The address 306 may be implemented using a pointer that points to the physical storage location storing the LOB file data. In the illustrated example, the physical address 306 for the LOB file 50 “XYZ” is “A1.” The counter 308 represents the total number of client(s) 12 that have requested the same LOB file data to be stored by the system 10. In the illustrated example, since the client 12 a is the first one that requested the LOB file 50 be stored, the counter 308 is set to “1.” The de-duplication flag 310 is used to indicate whether duplication of already stored data is desired. In the illustrated example, the de-duplication flag 310 for the LOB file is set to “ON,” indicating that no duplication of already stored data is desired. Alternatively, setting the de-duplication flag 310 to “OFF” would indicate that duplication of already stored data is desired.

In the illustrated embodiments, the system 10 may include a user interface that allows a user, such as an administrator, to input the de-duplication flag 310 information. For example, the user may input certain file type(s) for which data de-duplication is desired. In other examples, the user may input a source address for which data de-duplication is desired. In such case, if the system 10 receives data from the prescribed source address, the system 10 then performs data de-duplication. In other embodiments, the whether to perform data de-duplication may be determined by the client 12 transmitting the LOB file 50. For example, the client 12 may transmit the LOB file 50 to the system 10, and requesting the system 10 to perform data de-duplication. In such cases, the system 10 determines that data de-duplication is desired if it receives a request from the client 12 to perform data de-duplication.

It should be noted that various techniques may be used to store the LOB file data and the metadata for the LOB file 50, and that the system 10 should not be limited to using the example of the table 300 shown. For example, in other embodiments, the database 14 may include a hash value table 350 that identifies a unique index 352 for each hash value, and an index table 360 that contains metadata for each index value 352 (FIG. 4B). In such cases, after the de-duplication module 22 calculates the unique hash value 302 for the LOB file 50, the de-duplication module 22 then assigns and associates an index 352 with the hash value 302. The index 352 may be used to retrieve metadata for the LOB file, and/or access the LOB file. For example, as shown in the figure, once the index 352 has been determined, the index table 360 may be used to obtain the address (which is “A1” in the example) of the physical location storing the LOB file data. In further embodiments, the metadata for the LOB file 50 may be stored using other techniques (e.g., using more than two tables), and may or may not be in table form.

In any of the embodiments described herein, the de-duplication flag 310 may be contained in the table 350, instead of table 360 (FIG. 4C).

Referring again to FIG. 3, if the de-duplication module 22 determines that the LOB file 50 is already stored, the de-duplication module 22 then updates the database 14 (Step 128). Following the above example, assuming client 12 b now transmits a request to the system 10 requesting that a LOB file having identifier “ABC” be stored, wherein the LOB file data is the same as that of file “XYZ” stored for client 12 a. Because the LOB data for files “XYZ” and “ABC” are the same, the calculated hash value for the file “ABC” would be the same as the hash value for the “XYZ” file. The de-duplication module 22, upon checking the table 300, will determine that data being the same as that of the file “ABC” is already stored by the system 10 because the calculated hash value (“H3” in the example) can be found. The de-duplication module 22 then checks the table 300 to see if the already stored LOB file has a de-duplication flag 310 that is set “ON.” In the illustrated example, the LOB file associated with the hash value H3 has a de-duplication flag 310 that is set to “ON,” indicating that there should not be any duplication of the LOB file data. As a result, the de-duplication module 22 does not store a duplicate copy of the LOB file data, but updates the database 14 by incrementing the counter value 308 by one (e.g., from “1” to “2”), indicating that there are now two clients 12 (clients 12 a and 12 b in the example) that have requested the same LOB file data to be stored by the system 10 (FIG. 5A). The de-duplication module 22 also updates the database 14 by inserting a LOB identifier “ABC” prescribed by the second client 12 b. The above technique is advantageous in that the system 10 does not need to store multiple copies of the same LOB file for different clients 12. Alternatively, if the de-duplication flag 310 is set to “OFF,” the de-duplication module 22 then stores the LOB file data transmitted by client 12 b at another physical storage location (FIG. 5B), which in the example, is “B1.”

Assuming, in the example, that client 12 b now wishes to access the LOB data for LOB file named “ABC.” The client 12 b sends a request to the system 10 to access the data for LOB file “ABC.” Upon receiving the request, the system 10 checks the list of LOB identifiers (e.g., from table 300) to see if the LOB identifier “ABC” can be found. As shown in FIG. 5A, the LOB file identifier “ABC” can be found in the table 300, and has an address value of “A1,” which is the same address for the LOB file data stored for client 12 a. The system 10 uses the address “A1” to retrieve the LOB file data requested by the client 12 b, and transmits the LOB file data to the client 12 b.

Following the above example, assuming that client 12 a now sends a request to the system 10 requesting that the LOB file “XYZ” be deleted from the database 14. Upon receiving the request, the system 10 checks the list of LOB identifiers (e.g., from table 300) to see if the LOB identifier “XYZ” can be found. As shown in FIG. 5A, the LOB file identifier “XYZ” can be found in the table 300, and has a counter value of “2.” The de-duplication module 22 then updates the counter from “2” to “1” and remove the LOB identifier “XYZ,” thereby “deleting” the LOB file “XYZ” without actually deleting the LOB file data (FIG. 6). As long as the counter value is larger than zero, indicating that the stored LOB file data needs to be preserved for at least one client (which in the example is client 12 b), the actual LOB file data would not be deleted from the system 10.

Following the above example, assuming that client 12 b now sends a request to the system 10 requesting that the LOB file “ABC” be deleted from the database 14. Upon receiving the request, the system 10 checks the list of LOB identifiers (e.g., from table 300) to see if the LOB identifier “ABC” can be found. As shown in FIG. 6, the LOB file identifier “ABC” can be found in the table 300, and has a counter value of “1.” The de-duplication module 22 then updates the counter from “1” to “0.” Upon detecting that the counter is now equal to “0” (representing the fact that there is no remaining client 12 that whishes the LOB file data be stored), the de-duplication module 22 deletes the LOB file data in the database 14, thereby releasing the storage space for other purposes. In some embodiments, upon detecting that the counter 308 is “0,” the de-duplication module 22 does not delete the LOB file data immediately, but wait for a certain prescribed period (e.g., 3 months, 1 week, several days, etc.) before deleting the LOB file data from the database 14. This allows the client 12 to undo the delete operation in the event that the client 12 changes its mind within the prescribed period.

In other embodiments, the counter 308 can be used for other purposes. For example, in some embodiments, instead of, or in addition to, using the counter 308 to determine when to release storage space, the counter 308 can be used to determine when to start a new index. For example, in the embodiments of FIG. 4B, the LOB files 50 associated with index “I6” are considered to be in a group. However, in some cases, if the number of LOB files 50 becomes too big in a group, it may take the system 10 to long to process data in the group. As such, it may be desirable to limit the number of LOB files 50 that in a group. For example, an upper counter limit, e.g., 100, may be prescribed by an administrator. In such cases, if the counter 308 is equal to or exceeds 100, a new index may be provided to start a new group. The new index would have a counter that starts from “1” and is associated with the same hash value (“H3” in the example).

In further embodiments, the counter 308 can be used to indicate that a client 12 has requested one or more copies of the file be made. For example, assuming that the system 10 already stores a LOB file 50 having a hash value “H3,” which corresponds to a request to store the file “XYZ” from client 12 a and a request to store the file “ABC” from client 12 b (i.e., the files “XYZ” and “ABC” have the same data and therefore, the same hash value). If the client 12 a sends a request to make a copy of the LOB file “XYZ” in the database 14, the system 10 can satisfy such request by updating the counter 308 for the LOB file “XYZ” by one (e.g., from “1” to “2”). As such, the system 10 satisfies the request without explicitly making and storing a copy of the stored LOB file 50. In such cases, the metadata may include a plurality of counter values 308 for the LOB file 50, wherein each counter value 308 is associated with a LOB file identifier (e.g., “XYZ,” “ABC,” etc.). In the above example, the counter value 308 for the LOB file 50 “XYZ” has been updated from “1” to “2,” and the counter value 308 for the LOB file 50 “ABC” remains as “1.” As such, the total counter value for the file associated with hash value “H3” is “3,” indicating that there have been three requests to store the same file data (two requests from client 12 a, and one request from client 12 b).

As another example, assuming that the following is stored in the system 10:

Hash Val LOB ID Dedup Flag Count StorageAddr H3 XYZ, ABC ON 2 A1 H4 XYZ1, ABC1 ON 2 A2 If the client wishes to copy the data from XYZ to XYZ1 (that is, XYZ1 is the destination of the copy, and is to have the same data as XYZ), then the diagram becomes

Hash Val LOB ID Dedup Flag Count StorageAddr H3 XYZ, ABC, XYZ1 ON 3 A1 H4 ABC1 ON 1 A2 As shown in the example, the counter value 308 has been decremented for hash value H4, and incremented for hash value H3

In the above embodiments, the LOB file data is associated with a single address (e.g., “A1” in the example). However, in any of the embodiments described herein, the LOB file data may be associated with more than one address. For example, in other embodiments, each block 52 of the LOB file 50 may have an associated address. FIG. 7 illustrates an example in which the LOB file 50 is separated into five blocks (such as blocks 52 a-52 e shown in FIG. 2). Blocks 52 a-52 e have block identifiers “B1”-“B5,” respectively. The sizes of blocks 52 a-52 e are 250 kb, 250 kb, 248 kb, 252 kb, and 30 kb, respectively. Also, in the illustrated example, blocks 52 a-52 e are stored in addresses “A1”-“A5,” respectively. Assuming that the client 12 a sends a request to the system 10 to access a portion of the saved LOB file 50 (e.g., data from 260 kb to 800 kb). The system 10 then looks up the table 300, and based on the sizes of the blocks, determines that the requested data can be obtained from blocks B2-B4. In response to the client's 12 a request, the system 10 then retrieves the data that correspond to blocks B2-B4 using addresses A2-A4, respectively, and transmits the data to the client 12 a. Such technique is advantageous in that the system 10 needs not process the entire LOB file 50 in order to allow the client 12 to access a portion of the LOB file 50. In particular, since the system 10 can retrieve the requested data by accessing only the block(s) 52 that contains the requested data (individually accessing the block(s) 52), the system 10 can provide the client 12 access to any one of the blocks 52 without having to access the entire LOB file 50 that contains all the file data.

In any of the embodiments described herein, the database 14 can be one or a combination of storage devices that can store data. For example, the database 14 can be a single storage device that is configured to store various information described herein. In some cases, the storage device may be partitioned into a plurality of sub-storage devices, thereby allowing different information to be organized and maintained. In other examples, the database 14 can include two or more storage devices that are communicatively coupled (e.g., through internet or cable(s)) to each other. In such cases, the storage devices are configured to store different information described herein. In some embodiments, one or more of the storage devices may be partitioned to form a plurality of sub-storage devices.

Also, in other embodiments, the metadata described herein need not be stored in the database 14 according to the examples of the format shown previously. For example, in other embodiments, the metadata described herein may be stored in one or more tables. If a plurality of tables are used, one or more data from one table may be associated with one or more data from another table (e.g., using a common variable or a pointer). In further embodiments, the metadata described herein need not be stored in table format, and may be stored in the database 14 in other forms that are known in the art.

Data Compression

In some embodiments, the system 10 may further include a data compression module 24 (FIG. 8). The data compression module 24 is configured to compress data before the data is stored at the system 10. The data compression module 24 may also be configured to de-compress data in response to a client's request to retrieve/access the stored data.

FIG. 9 illustrates a process 400 that includes data compression performed by the data compression module 24 in accordance with some embodiments. As shown in the figure, the de-duplication module 22 receives the LOB file 50 (Step 122), and determines whether the LOB file 50 was already stored (Step 124). If the LOB file 50 was already stored, then the system 10 updates the database 14 without storing a duplicate of the LOB file 50 (Step 128). On the other hand, if the de-duplication module 22 determines that the LOB file 50 is not yet stored, the de-duplication module 22 then passes the LOB file data to the data compression module 24.

Upon detecting that there is a LOB file that is desired to be stored at the system 10, the data compression module 24 first checks data compression criteria (Step 402). The data compression criteria prescribes whether and/or how to perform data compression for the LOB file data based on certain rules set by a user. In the illustrated embodiments, the system 10 may include a user interface that allows a user, such as an administrator, to input the data compression criteria. For example, an administrator may prescribe one of four levels of compression, namely, “None,” “Low,” “Medium,” and “High” for a certain type or/and size of file. “None” compression is prescribed when no compression is desired to be performed for the file. “Low” compression is prescribed when some compression is desired. “High” compression is prescribed when significant compression is desired. In some cases, the user may, for example, prescribe a file size limit as a data compression criteria. In such cases, if the LOB file size is below the prescribed file size, the data compression module 24 may then perform a “Low” level of data compression, or may not perform any data compression at all. The user may, as another example, prescribe a file type and assign a certain level (e.g., “Medium”) of compression for such file type. For example, the user may prescribe all “.gif” file type be compressed at “Medium” level of compression. In other embodiments, the user interface may also allow the user to prescribe which data compression algorithm (which may or may not corresponds to a desired level of compression) to use for certain file based on the file type and/or file size. In other examples, the user may input a source address for which data compression is desired. In such case, if the system 10 receives data from the prescribed source address, the system 10 then performs data compression. The user may also prescribe which compression algorithm to use for data coming from certain prescribed source address. In other embodiments, the data compression criteria may be determined by the client 12 transmitting the LOB file 50. For example, the client 12 may transmit the LOB file 50 to the system 10, and requesting the system 10 to store the file 50 in a compressed form. In such cases, the system 10 determines that data compression is desired if it receives a request from the client 12 to compress the LOB file 50.

In further embodiments, the data compression module 24 may be configured to determine compression efficiency on at least a portion of the LOB file, and automatically determines a level of data compression for the LOB file. For example, if the data compression module 24 determines that the compression efficiency is low (e.g., below a prescribed limit), the data compression module 24 may not perform any data compression for the LOB file. On the other hand, if the data compression module 24 determines that the compression efficiency is high (e.g., above a prescribed limit), the data compression module 24 may perform a “High” level of data compression for the LOB file.

Returning to FIG. 9, next, the data compression module 24 compresses the LOB file data based on the compression criteria obtained from Step 402 (Step 404), and then stores the compressed LOB file data in the database 14 (Step 406). In some cases, if it is determined by the data compression module 24, based on the data compression criteria, that the received LOB file data is not to be compressed, the data compression module 24 then stores the LOB file data in uncompressed form at database 14 (Step 408). The storing of the LOB file may be performed based on a data collection threshold, as similarly discussed herein.

In the illustrated embodiments, the data compression module 24 is configured to create one or more compression unit for the LOB file 50. FIG. 10 illustrates an example of a LOB file 50, which is separated into blocks 52 a-52 e by the data receiving module 20. In the illustrated examples, blocks 52 a-52 e have data sizes 250 kb, 250 kb, 248 kb, 252 kb, and 30 kb, respectively. The data compression module 24 then creates three compression units 500 a-500 c, wherein each compression unit 500 corresponds to one or more blocks 52 having a total size that is less than (or equal to) a prescribed unit size. In the illustrated example, the prescribed unit size is 500 kb, which may be input by a user, such as an administrator. As a result, each compression unit 500 includes compressed data that correspond to uncompressed block(s) 52 having a total size that is 500 kb or less. In other embodiments, the uncompressed total size associated with a compression unit 500 can exceed the prescribed threshold. For example, in some cases, the system 10 may be configured to create a compression unit 500 when the total uncompressed data received exceeds the prescribed threshold (500 kb in the example).

As shown in the figure, compression unit 500 a includes a data compression map 502 a, a sub-unit 504 a that corresponds to the block 52 a, and a sub-unit 504 b that corresponds to the block 52 b. In particular, the sub-unit 504 a is the compressed data of block 52 a, and the sub-unit 504 b is the compressed data of block 52 b. The data compression map 502 a is a variable-sized map for the compression unit 500 a, which tracks the physical length and logical length of the sub-units 504 a, 504 b. Similarly, compression unit 500 b includes a data compression map 502 b, a sub-unit 504 c that corresponds to the block 52 c, and a sub-unit 504 d that corresponds to the block 52 d, and compression unit 500 c includes a compression map 502 c and a sub-unit 504 e that corresponds to the block 52 e. As shown in the illustrated example, compression unit 500 a corresponds to blocks 52 a, 52 b having a total size of 500 kb (which is equal to the prescribed unit size of 500 kb), compression unit 500 b corresponds to blocks 52 c, 52 d having a total size of 500 kb (which is equal to the prescribed unit size of 500 kb), and compression unit 500 c corresponds to block 52 e having a total size of 30 kb (which is less than the prescribed unit size of 500 kb).

FIG. 11A illustrates a table 300 of metadata for the LOB file 50 that may be stored in the database 14 after the LOB file data have been processed by the data compression module 24. As shown in the figure, the metadata includes the final calculated hash value 302 that uniquely identifies the LOB file 50, an identifier 304 of the LOB file 50, a counter 308, and a de-duplication flag 310. The hash value 302, identifier 304, counter 308, and the de-duplication flag 310 are similar to those discussed with reference to FIG. 4A. In the illustrated example, the metadata also includes a data compression flag 602, a data compression level 604, a data compression algorithm identifier 606. The data compression flag 602 is “ON,” indicating that the stored LOB file data has been compressed. The data compression level in the example is “High,” indicating that a high level of data compression is desired for the LOB file data. The data compression algorithm identifier 606 indicates that data compression algorithm “AL2” is used to perform data compression for the LOB file 50. Alternatively, the data compression flag 602 may be “OFF,” indicating that no data compression for the LOB file 50 has been performed. In other embodiments, the metadata stored in the database 14 may not include one or some of the ones discussed. For example, in other embodiments, the metadata may not include the data compression algorithm identifier 606.

In the illustrated example, the metadata also includes compressed unit identifiers 608 a-608 c that are identifiers of compressed units 500 a-500 c, respectively. The identifiers 608 a-608 c have respective values “CU1,” “CU2,” and “CU3.” The metadata also includes the size 610 of the portion of the LOB file 50 that corresponds with each respective compressed unit 500. In the illustrated example, the size 610 a of the portion of the LOB file 50 associated with the compressed unit 500 a is 500 kb, the size 610 b of the portion of the LOB file 50 associated with the compressed unit 500 b is 500 kb, and the size 610 c of the portion of the LOB file 50 associated with the compressed unit 500 c is 30 kb. In the illustrated example, the metadata further includes addresses 612 a-612 c that represent the physical storage location associated with the respective compressed units 500 a-500 c. In some embodiments, the addresses 612 may be implemented using pointers.

FIG. 12 illustrates an example of the data compression maps 502 a-502 c. The data compression map 502 a includes block identifiers 650 a, 650 b, the block sizes 652 a, 652 b for blocks 52 a, 52 b, respectively, and sub-unit sizes 654 a, 654 b, for sub-units 504 a, 504 b, respectively. The data compression map 502 a also includes sub-unit addresses 656 a, 656 b for the sub-units 504 a, 504 b, respectively. The data compression map 502 b includes block identifiers 650 c, 650 d, the block sizes 652 c, 652 d, for blocks 52 c, 52 d, respectively, and sub-unit sizes 654 c, 654 d, for sub-units 504 c, 504 d, respectively. The data compression map 502 b also includes sub-unit addresses 656 c, 656 d for the sub-units 504 c, 504 d, respectively. The data compression map 502 c includes block identifier 650 e, the block size 652 e for block 52 e, and sub-unit size 654 e for the sub-unit 504 e. The data compression map 502 c also includes sub-unit address 656 e for the sub-unit 504 e.

Assuming that the client 12 a wishes to access a portion of the LOB file 50 “XYZ,” wherein the portion is from the 260th kb to the 750th kb of the LOB file 50. The client 12 a sends a request to the system 10, which looks up the metadata for the LOB file 50 “XYZ.” Based on the block sizes 610 a, 610 b, from table 300, which cover the range of data requested by the client 12 a, the system 10 determines that the requested portion of the LOB file 50 can be obtained by accessing compression units 500 a “CU1,” and compression unit 500 b “CU2.” The system 10 then accesses the compression maps 502 a, 502 b of the compression units 500 a, 500 b. From the compression maps 502 a, the system 10 determines that the first block 52 a “B1” does not contain any requested data because it only covers data from 0 kb to 250 kb, and that the second block 52 b “B2” contains at least a portion of the requested data because it covers data from 251 kb to 500 kb. Using the address 656 b “SUA2” for the second sub-unit 504 b, the system 10 then retrieves the compressed data for the second sub-unit 504 b. The system 10 then de-compresses the data (having a size of 20 kb) from the sub-unit 504 b to obtain the uncompressed data (having a size of 250 kb), and transmits it to the client 12 a.

In the example, since sub-unit 504 b only provides data up to the 500th kb, in order to provide the remaining requested data (the 501st kb to the 750th kb) to the client 12 a, the system 10 accesses the next data compression map 502 b. According to the compression map 502 b, the next sub-unit 504 c can provide the 501st kb to the 748th kb. As such, the system 10 uses the sub-unit address 656 c to retrieve the compressed data for the sub-unit 504 c. The system 10 then de-compresses the data (having a size of 5 kb) from the sub-unit 504 c to obtain the uncompressed data (having a size of 248 kb), and transmits it to the client 12 a.

In the example, since sub-units 504 a, 504 b only provide data up to the 748th kb, in order to provide the remaining requested data (the 749th kb to the 750th kb) to the client 12 a, the system 10 accesses the next sub-unit 504 d. According to the compression map 502 b, the next sub-unit 504 d can provide the 749th kb to the 750th kb. As such, the system 10 uses the sub-unit address 656 d to retrieve the compressed data for the sub-unit 504 d. The system 10 then de-compresses the data (having a size of 30 kb) from the sub-unit 504 d to obtain the uncompressed data (having a size of 252 kb), and transmits it to the client 12 a.

As shown in the above embodiments, the system 10 is configured to perform two mappings, i.e., mapping the sub-units 504 with their respective blocks 52 (logical mapping), and mapping the sub-units 504 with their respective addresses 656 (physical mapping). Such technique is advantageous in that it allows the client 12 to access a portion of the LOB file 50 without having to process (e.g., perform data de-compression) on the entire LOB file 50.

In the above embodiments, different blocks 52 of the same LOB file 50 have the same data compression criteria. In other embodiments, different blocks 52 of the same LOB file 50 may have different compression requirements (e.g., compression levels, compression algorithms, etc.). FIG. 11B illustrates a variation of the metadata stored in the database 14, wherein different compression requirements are prescribed for different blocks 52 of the LOB file 50 “XYZ.” In the example, compression unit 500 a “CU1” is obtained using compression algorithm “AL2” which provides “High” level of data compression for the corresponding block 52 a. Compression unit 500 b “CU2” is obtained using compression algorithm “AL3” which provides “Low” level of data compression for the corresponding block 52 b. The compression flag for compression unit 500 c “CU3” is set to “OFF,” indicating that the data in the compression unit 500 c are not compressed. As shown in the figure, the compression level for the compression unit 500 c is set to “None,” and no data compression algorithm is designated. In other embodiments, in addition to compression algorithm(s), the table 300 or the data compression map(s) 502 may also include information regarding which algorithm(s) to use for compressing and/or de-compressing data from different sub-unit(s) 504.

In the above embodiments, different sub-units 504 associated with same compression unit 500 may use different compression algorithms and de-compression algorithms. In other embodiments, different sub-units 504 associated with the same compression unit 500 may use the same compression algorithm and de-compression algorithm, but sub-units 504 from different compression units 500 may use different compression algorithms and de-decompression algorithms.

In the above embodiments, a compression unit 500 may correspond to a plurality of blocks 52 from the LOB file 50. This is because the prescribed processing threshold (which is 260 kb in the above example) used by the data receiving module 20 to determine a size of a block 52, is different from the prescribed unit size (which is 500 kb in the above example) used by the data compression module 24 to determine how many block(s) 52 is covered by a compression unit 500. In other embodiments, each compression unit 500 may correspond to a single block 52. FIG. 13 illustrates an alternative embodiment in which each block 52 from the LOB file 50 is compressed to form a single compression unit 500. In the illustrated example, the LOB file 50 is separated by the data receiving module 22, based on the prescribed processing threshold, into five blocks 52 a-52 e. The data compression module 24 then performs data compression to create compression units 500 a-500 e for blocks 52 a-52 e, respectively.

In the above embodiments, the data compression module 24 is configured to store the LOB file 50 in the form of a plurality of compression units 500, such that the client 12 can perform random access of a portion of the LOB file 50. However, in other embodiments, the system 10 may not provide such feature. In such cases, the data compression module 24 may receive the LOB file 50 and then perform data compression to create a single compressed file for the LOB file 50.

As described in the above embodiments, the system 10 of FIG. 8 includes both the de-duplication module 22 and the data compression module 24. However, in other embodiments, the system 10 may not include the data de-duplication module 22. In such cases, the data compression module 24 is not configured to receive LOB file data from the de-duplication module 22, but from the data receiving module 20. In some embodiments, if the system 10 does not include the de-duplication module 22, each LOB file that is requested by a client 12 to be stored at the system 10 is compressed by the data compression module 24, and is then stored at a physical storage unit, without accounting for the possibility that the LOB file may be a duplicate of an already stored file. In other embodiments, duplication of data may be detected by another system (e.g., by the client 12, or by another processing unit coupled to the system 10). In such cases, the data compression module 22 will compress LOB file data that is not already stored at the database 14.

In any of the embodiments described herein, the system 10 may be configured to allow a data processing threshold to be inputted (e.g., via a user interface) for the data compression module 24. The data processing threshold for the data compression module 24 is the prescribed size of a portion of the LOB file 50 to be processed by the data compression module 24. For example, the data compression module 24 may be configured to keep track a size of the portion of the LOB file that has been processed by the data de-duplication module 22. When the size reaches or exceeds the prescribed data processing threshold for the data compression module 24, the data compression module 24 then performs the various functions associated with data compression described herein. The data processing threshold for the data compression module 24 may be the same as, or different from, that for the data de-duplication module 22.

Data Encryption

In some embodiments, the system 10 may further include a data encryption module 26 (FIG. 14). The data compression module 26 is configured to encrypt data before the data is stored at the system 10. The data encryption module 26 may also be configured to decrypt data in response to a client's request to retrieve/access the stored data.

FIG. 15 illustrates a process 700 that includes data encryption performed by the data encryption module 26 in accordance with some embodiments. As shown in the figure, the de-duplication module 22 receives the LOB file 50 (Step 122), and determines whether the LOB file 50 was already stored (Step 124). If the LOB file 50 was already stored, then the system 10 updates the database 14 without storing a duplicate of the LOB file 50 (Step 128). On the other hand, if the de-duplication module 22 determines that the LOB file 50 is not yet stored, the de-duplication module 22 then passes the LOB file data to the data compression module 24, which performs data compression (Step 404), as described previously.

After the LOB file data has been compressed, the LOB file data is then passed to the encryption module 26. The data encryption module 26 first checks data encryption criteria (Step 702). The data encryption criteria prescribes whether and/or how to perform data encryption for the LOB file data based on certain rules set by a user. In the illustrated embodiments, the system 10 may include a user interface that allows a user, such as an administrator, to input the data encryption criteria. For example, the user may input certain file type(s) for which data encryption is desired. The user may also prescribe which encryption algorithm to use for certain file type. In other examples, the user may input a source address for which data encryption is desired. In such case, if the system 10 receives data from the prescribed source address, the system 10 then performs data encryption. The user may also prescribe which encryption algorithm to use for data coming from certain prescribed source address. In other embodiments, the data encryption criteria may be determined by the client 12 transmitting the LOB file 50. For example, the client 12 may transmit the LOB file 50 to the system 10, and requesting the system 10 to store the file 50 in an encrypted form. In such cases, the system 10 determines that data encryption is desired if it receives a request from the client 12 to encrypt the LOB file 50.

If the data encryption module 26 determines, based on the data encryption criteria, that the LOB file 50 is not to be encrypted, the data encryption module 26 then passes the LOB file 50 to be stored in the database 14 (Step 708). The storing of the LOB file may be performed based on a data collection threshold, as similarly discussed herein.

On the other hand, if the data encryption criteria indicates that the LOB file 50 needs to be encrypted, the data encryption module 26 then performs data encryption for the LOB file 50 (Step 704), and passes the encrypted LOB file 50 downstream to be stored at the database 14 (Step 706). In some embodiments, the LOB file 50 is transmitted to the data encryption module 26 in the form of blocks 52, as described previously. The blocks 52 may be compressed if the system 10 includes the data compression module 24. In other embodiments, the blocks 52 may be uncompressed if the system 10 does not include the data compression module 24, or if the blocks 52 are not prescribed to be compressed based on the prescribed compression criteria. If the LOB file 50 is passed to the data encryption module 26 in the form of blocks 52, the data encryption module 26 then performs data encryption for the LOB file 50 on a block-by-block basis to create a plurality of encrypted blocks. Alternatively, the LOB file 50 may be passed to the data encryption module 26 as a single file. In such cases, the data encryption module 26 performs data encryption for the LOB file 50 to create a single encrypted LOB file.

Various techniques may be used by the data encryption module 26 to perform data encryption. In the illustrated embodiments, upon determining that the LOB file 50, or a block of the LOB file 50, needs to be encrypted, the data encryption module 26 obtains an encryption key from a database. The database providing the encryption key may be another database (not shown) or the database 14. The data encryption module 26 then encrypts the LOB file 50 or the block(s) of the LOB file 50 using a prescribed encryption algorithm and the encryption key. In some embodiments, the encryption algorithm used is based on a type of the LOB file 50. For example, an administrator may prescribe that encryption algorithm “EA2” be used by the data encryption module 26 to encrypt “.gif” file.

In the above embodiments, the data encryption is performed after the data compression. In other embodiments, instead of performing data encryption (Step 704) after data compression (Step 404), the system 10 may be configured to perform data compression (Step 404) after data encryption (Step 704).

FIG. 16A illustrates a table 300 of metadata for the LOB file 50 that may be stored in the database 14 after the LOB file data have been processed by the data encryption module 26. The metadata are similar to those discussed with reference to FIG. 11A, except that the metadata of FIG. 16A also includes an encryption flag 800 and an encryption key address 802. In the illustrated example, the encryption flag 800 is set to “ON,” indicating that the compression units “CU1,” “CU2,” and “CU3” are encrypted. The encryption key address 802 indicates the location at which the encryption key can be obtained. In some embodiments, the encryption key address 802 may be implemented using a pointer.

Assuming again, that the client 12 a wishes to access a portion of the LOB file 50 “XYZ,” wherein the portion is from the 260th kb to the 750th kb of the LOB file 50. The client 12 a sends a request to the system 10, which looks up the metadata for the LOB file 50 “XYZ.” Based on the encrypted block sizes 610 a, 610 b, from table 300, which cover the range of data requested by the client 12 a, the system 10 determines that the requested portion of the LOB file 50 can be obtained by accessing encrypted compression units 500 a “CU1,” and encrypted compression unit 500 b “CU2.” The system 10 then accesses the compression maps 502 a, 502 b of the encrypted compression units 500 a, 500 b. From the compression maps 502 a, the system 10 determines that the first block 52 a “B1” does not contain any requested data because it only covers data from 0 kb to 250 kb, and that the second block 52 b “B2” contains at least a portion of the requested data because it covers data from 251 kb to 500 kb. Using the address 656 b “SUA2” for the second sub-unit 504 b, the system 10 then retrieves the encrypted compressed data for the second sub-unit 504 b. The system 10 then obtains the encryption key using the encryption key address 802, and uses the encryption key to decrypt the data from sub-unit 504 b. After the data from the sub-unit 504 b is decrypted, the system 10 then de-compresses the data (having a size of 20 kb) from the sub-unit 504 b to obtain the uncompressed data (having a size of 250 kb), and transmits it to the client 12 a.

In the example, since sub-unit 504 b only provides data up to the 500th kb, in order to provide the remaining requested data (the 501st kb to the 750th kb) to the client 12 a, the system 10 accesses the next data compression map 502 b. According to the compression map 502 b, the next sub-unit 504 c can provide the 501st kb to the 748th kb. As such, the system 10 uses the sub-unit address 656 c to retrieve the encrypted compressed data for the sub-unit 504 c. The system 10 then uses the encryption key to decrypt the data from sub-unit 504 c. After the data from the sub-unit 504 c is decrypted, the system 10 then de-compresses the data (having a size of 5 kb) from the sub-unit 504 c to obtain the uncompressed data (having a size of 248 kb), and transmits it to the client 12 a.

In the example, since sub-units 504 a, 504 b only provide data up to the 748th kb, in order to provide the remaining requested data (the 749th kb to the 750th kb) to the client 12 a, the system 10 accesses the next sub-unit 504 d. According to the compression map 502 b, the next sub-unit 504 d can provide the 749th kb to the 750th kb. As such, the system 10 uses the sub-unit address 656 d to retrieve the encrypted compressed data for the sub-unit 504 d. The system 10 then uses the encryption key to decrypt the data from sub-unit 504 d. After the data from the sub-unit 504 d is decrypted, the system 10 then de-compresses the data (having a size of 30 kb) from the sub-unit 504 d to obtain the uncompressed data (having a size of 252 kb), and transmits it to the client 12 a.

In the above embodiments, the same encryption key is used to encrypt and decrypt sub-units 504 from different compression units 500. In other embodiments, different keys may be used to encrypt and decrypt different sub-units 504 associated with the same compression unit 500. In such cases, the compression map 502 of a compression unit 500 may include information regarding the encryption keys (e.g., locations of the encryption keys) for decrypting different sub-units 504 of the compression unit 500. In further embodiments, different compression units 500 may use different encryption keys, but sub-units 504 associated with the same compression unit 500 use the same encryption key.

FIG. 16B illustrates a variation of the example of the metadata shown in FIG. 16A, particularly showing that the compression units “CU1,” “CU2,” and “CU3” have different encryption criteria. Compression unit “CU1” has an encryption flag that is set to “ON,” indicating that the compression unit “CU1” has been encrypted, wherein the encryption key is located at address “K1.” Compression unit “CU2” (which may be, for example, a non-secure portion of the LOB file) has an encryption flag that is set to “OFF,” indicating that the compression unit “CU2” has not been encrypted. Compression unit “CU3” has an encryption flag that is set to “ON,” indicating that the compression unit “CU3” has been encrypted, wherein the encryption key is located at address “K2.” In the illustrated example, the system 10 is configured to use the encryption key located at “K1” to decrypt different sub-unit(s) 504 of the compression unit “CU1,” and the encryption key located at “K2” to decrypt different sub-unit(s) 504 of the compression unit “CU3.”

In other embodiments, instead of storing the encryption key address(es) in the database 14, the system 10 may be configured to store the encryption key identifier(s) in the database 14. In such cases, the encryption key identifier(s) may be used by the system 10 to obtain encryption key(s) from the database 14, or from another location.

In further embodiments, the system 10 may use an encryption key management system, in which the encryption key is encrypted to provide an additional level of security. In such cases, the encrypted encryption key is stored in another system (e.g., a second database). If the system 10 needs to obtain the encryption key, the system 10 then sends a request to the system, which in turn, obtains a master key from yet another system (e.g., a third database) 10. The second system then uses the master key to decrypt the encrypted encryption key, and transmits the decrypted encryption key to the system 10. Encryption key management system has been described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/084,346, entitled ““METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EXPIRING ENCRYPTED DATA”, the disclosure of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety.

In any of the embodiments described herein, the system 10 may be configured to allow a data processing threshold to be inputted (e.g., via a user interface) for the data encryption module 26. The data processing threshold for the data encryption module 26 is the prescribed size of a portion of the LOB file 50 to be processed by the data encryption module 26. For example, the data encryption module 26 may be configured to keep track a size of the portion of the LOB file that has been processed by the data compression module 24. When the size reaches or exceeds the prescribed data processing threshold for the data encryption module 26, the data encryption module 26 then performs the various functions associated with data encryption described herein. The data processing threshold for the data encryption module 26 may be the same as, or different from, that for the data de-duplication module 22 and/or the data compression module 24.

As described in the above embodiments, the system 10 of FIG. 14 includes the de-duplication module 22, the data compression module 24, and the data encryption module 26. However, in other embodiments, the system 10 may not include the data compression module 24. In such cases, the data encryption module 26 is not configured to receive LOB file data from the data compression module 24, but from the de-duplication module 22. In such cases, the data compression module 24 is configured to encrypt uncompressed data from the LOB file 50. In other embodiments, the system 10 may not include the de-duplication module 22. In further embodiments, the system 10 may not include both the de-duplication module 22 and the data compression module 24.

In any of the embodiments described herein, the metadata may further include a state indicator for tracking a state of a LOB file. The state indicator may be used for different purposes. FIGS. 17A-17B illustrate an example of using state indicators 800 to keep track of which LOB file(s) 50 has been re-keyed. As shown in FIG. 17A, the LOB files 50 a-50 f initially all have the same encryption key “K1,” and their corresponding state indicators 800 a-800 f are “0.” In some cases, for added security or maintenance, it may be desirable to change the encryption key (re-key) for the LOB files 50 after a certain prescribed period. To re-key for LOB file 50 a, the system 10 first obtains the original encryption key “K1” to decrypt the LOB file 50 a. The system 10 then obtains a new encryption key “K2” to encrypt the LOB file 50 a. After the re-key process has been performed form the LOB file 50 a, the state indicator 800 a for the LOB file 50 a is then changed from “0” to “1,” indicating that the LOB file 50 a has been re-keyed. The system 10 then performs the re-key process for the next LOB file 50 b, and so forth, until the last LOB file 50 f has been re-keyed.

Using a state indicator 800 to keep track of a state of a LOB file is advantageous in that it allows the system 10 to determine where in the table 300 to resume a re-key process if there is a system failure or error. For example, if there is a system failure or error that occurs after the fourth LOB file 50 d has been re-keyed, the state indicators 800 a-800 d would be “1” for the LOB files 50 a-50 d. In such cases, the system 10 looks for the next state indicator that is “0” (which is the one for LOB file 50 e), and determines that the re-key process needs to be resumed starting from LOB file 50 e. In existing systems, maintenance of the files stored in a table is performed on a table-by-table basis. As such, if an error occurs before all of the items in the table are processed, the maintenance would need to be re-started from the beginning. This results in a waste of system resources.

In other embodiments, instead of using a state indicator 800 for each LOB file 50, a state indicator may be used for each compression unit 500 to indicate a state of the compression unit 500 (e.g., whether the compression unit 500 has been re-keyed). In further embodiments, a state indicator 800 may be used for each sub-unit 504 to indicate a state of the sub-unit 504 (e.g., whether the sub-unit 504 has been re-keyed).

In further embodiments, instead of using the state indicator 800 to determine which LOB file 50, compression unit 500, or sub-unit 504, has been re-keyed or not, the state indicator 800 may be used to determine which LOB file 50, compression unit 500, or sub-unit 504 has been re-compressed using a different compression algorithm.

It should be noted that the system 10 needs not perform all of the steps described previously, and that the system 10 can be configured to perform only one or some of the steps in FIG. 15. For example, in other embodiments, the stored data may not be encrypted, and the system 10 does not perform data decryption. In other embodiments, the stored data may not be compressed, and the system 10 does not perform data decompression. In further embodiments, the stored data may not be encrypted and compressed. In such case, the system 10 does not perform data decryption and data decompression.

Computer System Architecture

FIG. 18 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a computer system 1000 that can be used to perform various functions described herein. In some embodiments, the computer system 1000 may be used to implement the system 10. In other embodiments, the computer system 1000 may be used to implement any of the components of the system 10, such as, the data receiving module 20, the data de-duplication module 22, the data compression module 24, or the data encryption module 26. In further embodiments, the computer system 1000 may be used to implement the database 14.

Computer system 1000 includes a bus 1002 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a processor 1004 coupled with the bus 1002 for processing information. The processor 1004 may be a processor in the system 10 of FIG. 1 that is used to perform the various functions described herein. The computer system 1000 also includes a main memory 1006, such as a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to the bus 1002 for storing information and instructions to be executed by the processor 1004. The main memory 1006 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by the processor 1004. The computer system 1000 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 1008 or other static storage device coupled to the bus 1002 for storing static information and instructions for the processor 1004. A data storage device 1010, such as a magnetic disk or optical disk, is provided and coupled to the bus 1002 for storing information and instructions.

The computer system 1000 may be coupled via the bus 1002 to a display 1012, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), for displaying information to a user. An input device 1014, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to the bus 1002 for communicating information and command selections to processor 1004. Another type of user input device is cursor control 1016, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 1004 and for controlling cursor movement on display 1012. This input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (e.g., x) and a second axis (e.g., y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane. The display 1012, input device 1014, and the cursor control 1016 may be used to implement various user interfaces described herein.

In some embodiments, the computer system 1000 can be used to perform various functions described herein. According to some embodiments of the invention, such use is provided by computer system 1000 in response to processor 1004 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in the main memory 1006. Those skilled in the art will know how to prepare such instructions based on the functions and methods described herein. Such instructions may be read into the main memory 1006 from another computer-readable medium, such as storage device 1010. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in the main memory 1006 causes the processor 1004 to perform the process steps described herein. One or more processors in a multi-processing arrangement may also be employed to execute the sequences of instructions contained in the main memory 1006. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the invention. Thus, embodiments of the invention are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.

The term “computer-readable medium” as used herein refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to the processor 1004 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media and volatile media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as the storage device 1010. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as the main memory 1006.

Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge as described hereinafter, or any other medium from which a computer can read.

Various forms of computer-readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to the processor 1004 for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a telephone line using a modem. A modem local to the computer system 1000 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infrared transmitter to convert the data to an infrared signal. An infrared detector coupled to the bus 1002 can receive the data carried in the infrared signal and place the data on the bus 1002. The bus 1002 carries the data to the main memory 1006, from which the processor 1004 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by the main memory 1006 may optionally be stored on the storage device 1010 either before or after execution by the processor 1004.

The computer system 1000 also includes a communication interface 1018 coupled to the bus 1002. The communication interface 1018 provides a two-way data communication coupling to a network link 1020 that is connected to a local network 1022. For example, the communication interface 1018 may be an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card or a modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line. As another example, the communication interface 1018 may be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN. Wireless links may also be implemented. In any such implementation, the communication interfaces 1018 sends and receives electrical, electro magnetic or optical signals that carry data streams representing various types of information.

The network link 1020 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other devices. For example, the network link 1020 may provide a connection through local network 1022 to a host computer 1024 or to equipment/device 1026, or a switch operatively coupled to any of the devices described herein. The data streams transported over the network link 1020 can comprise electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals. The signals through the various networks and the signals on the network link 1020 and through the communication interface 1018, which carry data to and from the computer system 1000, are exemplary forms of carrier waves transporting the information. The computer system 1000 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), the network link 1020, and the communication interface 1018.

Although particular embodiments have been shown and described, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the claimed inventions, and it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the application. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense. The present inventions are intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the present inventions as defined by the claims. 

What is claimed:
 1. A computer implemented method of processing a data object, comprising: using a computer system which comprises at least one processor and is programmed for performing a process, the process comprising: receiving a request to store the data object; receiving the data object; determining, at a deduplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in a non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, a unique identifier for the data object based in part or in whole upon contents of the data object, instead of based upon a name of the data object, at least by transforming the contents of the data object with a transformation; determining whether a database contains a first data object identified by a different data object name but comprising first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object at least by computing an identifier for at least a portion of the first data object contents and further by comparing the unique identifier for the data object to the identifier for the at least the portion of the first data object contents; and determining whether to store a duplicative copy of the contents in the database based in part or in whole upon a duplication indicator that is stored with at least the unique identifier in an identifier data structure and corresponds to the contents of the data object in the database; storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has already contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is to be stored in the database; and storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has not contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining a data processing threshold; and separating the data object into a plurality of portions based on the data processing threshold.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising compressing at least a portion of the data object.
 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising storing a data compression flag to indicate that data compression has been performed.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a data compression criteria, and compressing at least a portion of the data object based on the data compression criteria or encrypting at least a portion of the data object.
 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a plurality of rolling identifiers for the data object during a period of time when the data object is being received; and determining a final unique identifier as the unique identifier.
 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising: storing a data encryption flag to indicate that data encryption has been performed; determining one or more data encryption criteria; and encrypting at least a portion of the data object based on the one or more data encryption criteria, wherein the data object comprises a LOB data object, and the LOB data object comprises an image data object.
 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, at a data receiving module stored at least partially in memory, the request to store the data object that comprises a large object (LOB) file in the database from a client; and reflecting a state where more than one client has requested storage of the large object file at least by updating the database without storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has already contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the large object file, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is not to be stored in the database.
 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising: receiving, at the data receiving module stored at least partially in memory, at least a portion of the large object file for the request from the client, the at least the portion being smaller than the larger object file; determining a size of the at least the portion of the large object file; generating a size comparison result at least by comparing the size of the at least the portion of the large object file to a prescribed data processing threshold; generating a cumulative amount collection result at least by determining whether a cumulatively collected amount for the large object file is equal to or larger than the prescribed data processing threshold; transmitting the cumulatively collected amount for the large object file to downstream processing when it is determined that the cumulatively collected amount for the large object file is equal to or larger than the prescribed data processing threshold; and performing the downstream processing at least by computing a first rolling unique identifier for the cumulatively collected amount of the large object file.
 10. The method of claim 9, examining the identifier data structure to determine whether the first rolling unique identifier for the cumulatively collected amount is found in the identifier data structure; storing the duplicative copy of the cumulatively collected amount in the database when the first rolling unique identifier for the cumulatively collected amount is not found in the identifier data structure, wherein the database comprises the identifier data structure storing thereupon at least the duplication indicator, the unique identifier, and an index corresponding to the unique identifier as well as an index data structure storing thereupon metadata for the index, an address corresponding to a physical location of the first data object contents identical to the contents of the large object file in the database, and a duplication request counter but not the duplication indicator; storing the duplicative copy of the cumulatively collected amount in the database when the first rolling unique identifier for the cumulatively collected amount is found in the identifier data structure, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the large object file is to be stored in the database; continuing, at the data receiving module, to receive one or more additional portions of the large object file when the first unique identifier is found in the identifier data structure until another cumulatively collected amount is equal to or larger than the prescribed data processing threshold; transmitting the another cumulatively collected amount for the large object file to the downstream processing when it is determined that the another cumulatively collected amount for the large object file is equal to or larger than the prescribed data processing threshold; performing the downstream processing at least by computing a second rolling unique identifier for the another cumulatively collected amount of the large object file; examining the identifier data structure to determine whether the second rolling unique identifier for the another cumulatively collected amount is found in the identifier data structure; storing the duplicative copy of the another cumulatively collected amount in the database when the second rolling unique identifier for the cumulatively collected amount is not found in the identifier data structure; storing the duplicative copy of the another cumulatively collected amount in the database when the second rolling unique identifier for the another cumulatively collected amount is found in the identifier data structure, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the large object file is to be stored in the database; repeatedly receiving and transmitting remaining data for the large object file based in part or in whole upon the prescribed data processing threshold until the large object file is completely received at the data receiving module; configuring a user interface that allows activation and deactivation of the data receiving module; bypassing the data receiving module and transmitting the large object file directly to a de-duplication module for de-duplication without being processed by the data receiving module when the data receiving module is deactivated; repeatedly receiving and writing multiple cumulatively collected amounts for the large object file in a temporary storage device with respect to the prescribed data processing threshold; computing rolling unique identifiers for the large object file at least by calculating the rolling unique identifiers for the multiple cumulatively collected amounts for the large object file as the multiple cumulatively collected amounts are repeatedly received and transmitted with respect to the prescribed data processing threshold; computing a final unique identifier that uniquely identifies the large object file at completion of writing of the multiple cumulatively collected amounts for the large object file; maintaining metadata regarding the large object file in a metadata data structure, the metadata comprising the final unique identifier, an address of a physical storage location for the large object file, a counter of a total number of client requests for the contents of the large object file, and the duplication indicator for the large object file; incrementing a value of the counter in response to the request to store the data object comprising the large object file when the first rolling unique identifier for the cumulatively collected amount is found in the identifier data structure, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the large object file is not to be stored in the database; assigning unique indices respectively for the rolling unique identifiers in the identifier data structure; retrieving the metadata for the first rolling unique identifier for the cumulatively collected amount of the large object file with at least a first unique index corresponding to the first rolling unique identifier; retrieving the metadata for the second rolling unique identifier for the another cumulatively collected amount of the large object file with at least a second unique index corresponding to the second rolling unique identifier; receiving, at the data receiving module stored at least partially in the memory, a request to delete the large object file from the database; identifying the final unique identifier that uniquely identifies the large object file; determining a current counter value of the counter corresponding to the large object file; examining the identifier data structure to determine whether the final unique identifier for the large object file is found in the identifier data structure; decrementing the current counter value to a decremented current counter value for the large object file to satisfy the request to delete the large object file without actually deleting the contents of the large object file from the database when the final unique identifier is found in the identifier data structure, and when the decremented current counter value is greater than zero; and decrementing the current counter value to the decremented current counter value for the large object file to satisfy the request to delete the large object file while actually removing the contents of the large object file from the database when the final unique identifier is found in the identifier data structure, and when the decremented current counter value is equal to zero.
 11. The method of claim 9, wherein the LOB data object comprises an audio data object.
 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining one or more data de-duplication criteria.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the one or more data de-duplication criteria comprises information regarding whether data object duplication is desired.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the act of determining whether the database already contains the data object comprises calculating a hash value for the data object.
 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the act of determining whether the database already contains the data object comprises receiving a hash value for the data object.
 16. A system for processing a data object, comprising: a computer system which comprises at least one processor; a memory storing thereupon a sequence of instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor at least to: receive a request to store the data object; receive the data object; determine, at a deduplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in a non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, a unique identifier for the data object based in part or in whole upon contents of the data object instead of based upon a name of the data object at least by transforming the contents of the data object with a transformation; determine, at the data de-duplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in the non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, whether a database contains a first data object identified by a different data object name but comprising first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object at least by computing an identifier for at least a portion of the first data object contents and further by comparing the unique identifier for the data object to the identifier for the at least the portion of the first data object contents; and determine whether to store a duplicative copy of the contents in the database based in part or in whole upon a duplication indicator that is stored with at least the unique identifier in an identifier data structure and corresponds to the contents of the data object in the database; store the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has already contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the large object file, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is to be stored in the database; and store the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has not contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the large object file.
 17. A computer product having a non-transitory computer-useable medium storing a set of instruction which, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform a set of acts, the set of acts comprising: receiving a request to store the data object; receiving the data object; determining, at a deduplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in a non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, a unique identifier for the data object based in part or in whole upon contents of the data object instead of based upon a name of the data object, at least by transforming the contents of the data object with a transformation; determining, at the data de-duplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in the non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, whether a database contains a first data object identified by a different data object name but comprising first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object at least by computing an identifier for at least a portion of the first data object contents and further by comparing the unique identifier for the data object to the identifier for the at least the portion of the first data object contents; and determining whether to store a duplicative copy of the contents in the database in based in part or in whole upon a duplication indicator that is stored with at least the unique identifier in an identifier data structure and corresponds to the contents of the data object in the database; storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has already contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the large object file, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is to be stored in the database; and storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has not contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the large object file.
 18. A computer implemented method of processing a data object, comprising: using a computer system which comprises at least one processor and is programmed for performing: receiving a request to store the data object; receiving the data object; determining, at a deduplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in a non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, a unique identifier for the data object based in part or in whole upon contents of the data object instead of based upon a name of the data object, at least by transforming the contents of the data object with a transformation; determining, at the data de-duplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in the non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, whether a database contains a first data object identified by a different data object name but comprising first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object at least by computing an identifier for at least a portion of the first data object contents and further by comparing to the identifier for the at least the portion of the first data object contents the unique identifier for the data object; and determining whether to store a duplicative copy of the contents in the database based in part or in whole upon a duplication indicator that is stored with at least the unique identifier in an identifier data structure and corresponds to the contents of the data object in the database; satisfying the request to store the data object at least by storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is to be stored in the database; and storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has not contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object.
 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising: determining a data processing threshold; and separating the data object into a plurality of portions based on the data processing threshold.
 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the data object comprises a LOB data object.
 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the LOB data object comprises an image data object.
 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the LOB data object comprises an audio data object.
 23. The method of claim 18, further comprising determining one or more data de-duplication criteria.
 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the one or more data de-duplication criteria comprises information regarding whether data object duplication is desired.
 25. The method of claim 18, wherein the act of determining whether the database already contains the data object comprises calculating a hash value for the data object.
 26. The method of claim 18, wherein the act of determining whether the database already contains the data object comprises receiving a hash value for the data object.
 27. The method of claim 18, wherein the request is satisfied by updating metadata of the data object.
 28. The method of claim 27, wherein the metadata comprises a counter that represents a total number of request to store the data object.
 29. A system for processing a data object, comprising: a computer system which comprises at least one processor; a memory storing thereupon a sequence of instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor at least to: receive a request to store the data object; receive the data object; determine, at a deduplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in a non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, a unique identifier for the data object based in part or in whole upon contents of the data object instead of based upon a name of the data object, at least by transforming the contents of the data object with a transformation; determine, at the data de-duplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in the non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, whether a database contains a first data object identified by a different data object name but comprising first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object at least by computing an identifier for at least a portion of the first data object contents and further by comparing the unique identifier for the data object to the identifier for the at least the portion of the first data object contents; determine whether to store a duplicative copy of the contents in the database based in part or in whole upon a duplication indicator that is stored with at least the unique identifier in an identifier data structure and corresponds to the contents of the data object in the database; satisfy the request to store the data object at least by storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has already contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is to be stored in the database; and store the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has not contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object.
 30. A computer product having a non-transitory computer-useable medium storing a set of instruction which, when executed by at least one processor of a computer system, causes the computer system to perform a set of acts for processing a data object, the process comprising: using the computer system which comprises the at least one processor and is programmed for performing: receiving a request to store the data object; receiving the data object; determining, at a deduplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in a non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, a unique identifier for the data object based in part or in whole upon contents of the data object instead of based upon a name of the data object, at least by transforming the contents of the data object with a transformation; determining, at the data de-duplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in the non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, whether a database contains a first data object identified by a different data object name but comprising first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object at least by computing an identifier for at least a portion of the first data object contents and further by comparing the unique identifier for the data object to the identifier for the at least the portion of the first data object contents; determining whether to store a duplicative copy of the contents in the database based in part or in whole upon a duplication indicator that is stored with at least the unique identifier in an identifier data structure and corresponds to the contents of the data object in the database; satisfying the request to store the data object at least by storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has already contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is to be stored in the database; and storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has not contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object.
 31. A computer implemented method of processing data from a data object, comprising: using a computer system which comprises at least one processor and is programmed for performing a set of acts, the set of acts comprising: receiving a request to store the data object in a database; receiving the data object; separating the data object into a plurality of portions; determining, at a deduplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in a non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, a unique identifier for one of the plurality of portions based in part or in whole upon contents of the one of the plurality of portions instead of based on a name of the one of the plurality of portions or a first name of the data object, at least by transforming the contents with a transformation; determining, at the data de-duplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in the non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, whether the database contains a first data object identified by a different data object name but comprising first data object contents identical to the contents of the one of the plurality of portions at least by computing an identifier for at least a portion of the first data object contents and further by comparing the unique identifier for the one of the plurality of portions to the identifier for the at least the portion of the first data object contents; determining whether to store a duplicative copy of the contents in the database based in part or in whole upon a duplication indicator that is stored with at least the unique identifier in an identifier data structure and corresponds to the contents of the data object in the database; storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has already contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is to be stored in the database; and storing the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has not contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object.
 32. The method of claim 31, wherein the act of separating the data object is performed without specifically requested by a client.
 33. The method of claim 31, wherein the data object comprises a LOB data object.
 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the LOB data object comprises an image data object.
 35. The method of claim 33, wherein the LOB data object comprises an audio data object.
 36. The method of claim 31, wherein the data object is separated into the plurality of portions by: determining a data processing threshold; and separating the data object into the plurality of portions based on the data processing threshold.
 37. The method of claim 31, wherein one of the plurality of portions can be accessed without accessing another one of the plurality of portions.
 38. A system for processing data from a data object, comprising: a computer system which comprises at least one processor; a memory storing thereupon a sequence of instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor at least to: receive a request to store the data object in a database; receive the data object; separate the data object into a plurality of portions; and determine, at a deduplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in a non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, a unique identifier for one of the plurality of portions based in part or in whole upon contents of the one of the plurality of portions instead of based on a name of the one of the plurality of portions or a first name of the data object, at least by transforming the contents with a transformation; determine, at the data de-duplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in the non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, whether the database contains a first data object identified by a different data object name but comprising first data object contents identical to the contents of the one of the plurality of portions at least by computing an identifier for at least a portion of the first data object contents and further by comparing the unique identifier for the one of the plurality of portions to the identifier for the at least the portion of the first data object contents; and determine whether to store a duplicative copy of the contents in the database based in part or in whole upon a duplication indicator that is stored with at least the unique identifier in an identifier data structure and corresponds to the contents of the data object in the database; store the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has already contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is to be stored in the database; and store the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has not contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object.
 39. A computer product having a non-transitory computer-useable storage medium storing a set of instruction which, when executed by at least one processor of a computer system, causes the at least one processor to execute a set of acts for processing a data object, the set of acts comprising: receiving a request to store the data object in a database; receiving the data object; separating the data object into a plurality of portions; determining, at a deduplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, a unique identifier for one of the plurality of portions based in part or in whole upon contents of the one of the plurality of portions instead of based on a name of the one of the plurality of portions or a first name of the data object, at least by transforming the contents with a transformation; determining, at the data de-duplication module functioning in conjunction with the at least one processor and stored in the non-transitory computer accessible storage medium, whether the database contains a first data object identified by a different data object name but comprising first data object contents identical to the contents of one of the plurality of portions at least by computing an identifier for at least a portion of the first data object contents and further by comparing the unique identifier for the one of the plurality of portions to the identifier for the at least the portion of the first data object contents; and determine whether to store a duplicative copy of the contents in the database based in part or in whole upon a duplication indicator that is stored with at least the unique identifier in an identifier data structure and corresponds to the contents of the data object in the database; store the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has already contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object, and when the duplication indicator corresponding to the contents of the data object indicates that the duplicative copy of the contents is to be stored in the database; and store the duplicative copy of the contents in the database when it is determined that the database has not contained the first data object contents identical to the contents of the data object. 